By studying a Soviet R&D failure, the prewar attempt to create a new aeroengine\udtechnology based on the steam turbine, we find out more about the motivations,\udstrategies, and payoffs of principals and agents in the Soviet command economy.\udAlternative approaches to the evaluation of R&D failure are outlined. New archival\uddocumentation shows the scale and scope of the Soviet R&D effort in this field. The\udallocation of R&D resources resulted from agents’ horizontal interactions within a\udvertical command hierarchy. Project funding was determined in a context of biased\udinformation, adverse selection, and agents’ rent seeking. Funding was rationed across\udprojects and through time. Budget constraints on individual projects were softened in\udthe presence of sunk costs, but were hardened periodically. There is no evidence that\udrents were intentionally distributed through the Soviet military R&D system to win\udtrust or reward loyalty; the termination of aviation steam power R&D in 1939 despite\udthe sunk costs they represented was timely.
展开▼
机译:通过研究苏联的研发失败,战前试图基于蒸汽轮机创建新的航空发动机\ udtech的技术,我们可以找到有关苏联指挥经济中委托人和代理人的动机,\策略和收益的更多信息。概述了研发失败的评估。新的档案\ uddocumentation显示了苏联在该领域的研发工作的规模和范围。研发资源的“分配”是由于代理在垂直命令层次结构中的水平交互作用而产生的。项目资金的确定是在有偏见的\虚假信息,逆向选择和代理商寻求租金的情况下进行的。整个项目在整个项目中都按时分配了资金。在存在沉没成本的情况下,对单个项目的预算约束有所缓解,但会定期得到加强。没有证据表明,有人通过苏联军事研发系统故意分配\ u \ r \ u \ u \ u200b \ u200b \ u200b \ u200b \ u200b \ u003b尽管他们表示的沉没成本是及时的,但在1939年终止了航空蒸汽动力研发。
展开▼